Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/131438
Title: Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice
Authors: Kraus, S.
Breier, M.
Lim, W. M.
Dabić, M.
Kumar, S.
Kanbach, D.
Mukherjee, D.
Corvello, V.
Piñeiro-Chousa, J.
Liguori, E.
Palacios-Marqués, D.
Schiavone, F.
Ferraris, A.
Fernandes, C.
Ferreira, J. J.
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Citation: Kraus, S, Breier, M, Lim, WM, Dabić, M, Kumar, S, Kanbach, D, Mukherjee, D, Corvello, V, Piñeiro-chousa, J, Liguori, E, Palacios-marqués, D, Schiavone, F, Ferraris, A, Fernandes, C & Ferreira, JJ 2022, 'Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice', Review of Managerial Science, Том. 16, № 8, стр. 2577-2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W. M., Dabić, M., Kumar, S., Kanbach, D., Mukherjee, D., Corvello, V., Piñeiro-chousa, J., Liguori, E., Palacios-marqués, D., Schiavone, F., Ferraris, A., Fernandes, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16(8), 2577-2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
Abstract: Review articles or literature reviews are a critical part of scientific research. While numerous guides on literature reviews exist, these are often limited to the philosophy of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures, triggering non-parsimonious reporting and confusion due to overlapping similarities. To address the aforementioned limitations, we adopt a pragmatic approach to demystify and shape the academic practice of conducting literature reviews. We concentrate on the types, focuses, considerations, methods, and contributions of literature reviews as independent, standalone studies. As such, our article serves as an overview that scholars can rely upon to navigate the fundamental elements of literature reviews as standalone and independent studies, without getting entangled in the complexities of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures. © 2022, The Author(s).
Keywords: BIBLIOMETRICS
CONTRIBUTIONS
LITERATURE REVIEWS
META ANALYSIS
METHODS
URI: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/131438
Access: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
cc-by
License text: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
SCOPUS ID: 85139218895
WOS ID: 000873933300001
PURE ID: 31790812
cea4d55c-070d-41ac-8e4c-8e0f276bec74
ISSN: 1863-6683
DOI: 10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
Sponsorship: Libera Università di Bolzano, UNIBZ
Open access funding provided by Libera Università di Bolzano within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Appears in Collections:Научные публикации ученых УрФУ, проиндексированные в SCOPUS и WoS CC

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2-s2.0-85139218895.pdf1,59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons