Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/118008
Title: СУДЕБНАЯ РЕФОРМА ПЕТРА ВЕЛИКОГО В КОНТЕКСТЕ АДМИНИСТРАТИВНЫХ ПРЕОБРАЗОВАНИЙ (1717–1727)
Other Titles: THE JUDICIAL REFORM OF PETER THE GREAT IN THE CONTEXT OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFORMATIONS (1717–1727)
Authors: Borodina, E. V.
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch of RAS
Citation: Borodina E. V. THE JUDICIAL REFORM OF PETER THE GREAT IN THE CONTEXT OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFORMATIONS (1717–1727) [СУДЕБНАЯ РЕФОРМА ПЕТРА ВЕЛИКОГО В КОНТЕКСТЕ АДМИНИСТРАТИВНЫХ ПРЕОБРАЗОВАНИЙ (1717–1727)] / E. V. Borodina // Ural'skij Istoriceskij Vestnik. — 2022. — Vol. 75. — Iss. 2. — P. 16-24.
Abstract: The judicial reform occupies a special place among other transformations of Peter the Great. Some researchers call it the first attempt to “separate the trial from the administration”. Other scholars believe that the judicial reforms of the first quarter of the 18th century cannot be separated from the management reforms, since the changes in the court and administration were closely related to each other and had common ideological foundations expressed in the works of cameralists. The article is devoted to the analysis of the judicial reform of 1717–1727. The study focuses on the exploration of the organization of the court and “lower” tribunals, originally represented by provincial and city courts. The author characterizes the locations of court and provincial tribunals and considers the main reasons for the creation (or not creation) of judicial districts in provinces. In addition, attention is drawn to the peculiarities of the formation of judicial districts of city judges and judicial commissioners. As a result of the analysis of legal acts and documents of the court’s office, the author concluded that the second provincial reform had a strong influence on the implementation of the judicial reform. Despite the attempts of the Judicial Collegium to distribute judges evenly across the country, judicial transformations spread from the center (St. Petersburg and Moscow) to the southern and eastern periphery. In some cases, the determination of the composition of judges and their placement in judicial districts was inconsistent, which predetermined the partial and then full return of judicial powers to local administrators. © 2022 Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch of RAS. All rights reserved.
Keywords: 18TH CENTURY
CAMERALISM
CITY JUDGE
COURT TRIBUNAL
HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW
JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER
JUDICIAL REFORM
LAW TRIBUNAL
RUSSIAN EMPIRE
RUSSIAN HISTORY
URI: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/118008
Access: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
RSCI ID: 48645437
SCOPUS ID: 85134663188
PURE ID: 30461303
ISSN: 17289718
DOI: 10.30759/1728-9718-2022-2(75)-16-24
Appears in Collections:Научные публикации ученых УрФУ, проиндексированные в SCOPUS и WoS CC

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2-s2.0-85134663188.pdf290,58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.