Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/117860
Название: «Онтологический поворот» в социальных науках: возвращение эпистемологии
Другие названия: The “Ontological Turn” in the Social Sciences: The Return of Epistemology
Авторы: Kerimov, T.
Дата публикации: 2022
Издатель: National Research University, Higher School of Econoimics
Библиографическое описание: Kerimov T. The “Ontological Turn” in the Social Sciences: The Return of Epistemology [«Онтологический поворот» в социальных науках: возвращение эпистемологии] / T. Kerimov // Russian Sociological Review. — 2022. — Vol. 21. — Iss. 1. — P. 109-130.
Аннотация: In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in ontological research in the social sciences, the content and direction of which are described as an “ontological turn”. These studies set the formation of a new social ontology as their main goal. The article reveals the basic principles and content of this new social ontology, identifies controversial issues inherent in such a method of its renewal, and formulates guidelines for the return of epistemology to overcome the undesirable consequences of the “ontological turn”. Criticism of the «ontological turn» and the rationale for the return of epistemology are argued as follows; in the first section of the article, two possibilities of constructing a social ontology are considered, those of the essentialist ontology of mainstream sociology and the “flat ontology” of assemblage. The second section provides a critical analysis of three consequences of the “ontological turn”: the problematization of the idea of the autonomous social; the neutralization of the a priori ontological reasoning of social research; and the denial of the real outside beyond the assemblage. In the third section, the consequences of the “ontological turn” are considered in the context of the current discussion about the role of ontology in the social sciences, which is expressed through the opposition of a priori ontological and instrumental-pragmatic justification of social research. To overcome such consequences, the following guidelines for the return of epistemology are formulated: the “underdetermination” of reality by theories; the epistemological difference between the conceptual reality of an object and its ontological reality; and the equality (covariation) of ontology and epistemology. © 2022. Russian Sociological Review. All Rights Reserved.
Ключевые слова: ACTUALISM
ASSEMBLY
EPISTEMOLOGICAL DIFFERENCE
ESSENTIALISM
FLAT ONTOLOGY
MAINSTREAM SOCIOLOGY
UNDERDETERMINATION OF REALITY
URI: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/117860
Условия доступа: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Идентификатор РИНЦ: 48491507
Идентификатор SCOPUS: 85129231461
Идентификатор WOS: 000778992400005
Идентификатор PURE: 29994282
ISSN: 1728192X
DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2022-1-109-130
Располагается в коллекциях:Научные публикации ученых УрФУ, проиндексированные в SCOPUS и WoS CC

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
2-s2.0-85129231461.pdf284,84 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.