Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/75386
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorBogatov, A. A.en
dc.contributor.authorLezhnev, S. N.en
dc.contributor.authorTolkushkin, A. O.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-21T08:51:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-21T08:51:29Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationBogatov A. A. Damage criterion comparison at unidirectional and alternating torsion of samples / A. A. Bogatov, S. N. Lezhnev, A. O. Tolkushkin // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. — 2018. — Vol. 461. — Iss. 1. — 12086.en
dc.identifier.issn1757-8981-
dc.identifier.other67668id
dc.identifier.otherhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=8YFLogxK&scp=85059436761m
dc.identifier.otherhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/461/1/012086/pdfpdf
dc.identifier.otherf5851b9c-17a5-469b-ac2a-2422f65e69d4pure_uuid
dc.identifier.urihttp://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/75386-
dc.description.abstractThe paper presents the results of the analysis of computer simulation of unidirectional and alternating torsion of cylindrical samples in the software complex Deform 3D. The accumulated deformation degree and damage criterion were taken as compared parameters. Damage was calculated by two existing methods: Cockroft-Latham and Bogatov methods. The results of the analysis show that the proposed method for determining the damage criterion is more accurate when testing samples for alternating twisting than the most currently used method since it takes into account the number of loading stages and the plastic deformation amplitude. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.en
dc.description.sponsorshipBVD PECE spol. s r.o.;CSNMT;DynaWeld;EDAX;et al.;Linseisen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInstitute of Physics Publishingen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rightscc-byother
dc.rightsgoldother
dc.sourceIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineeringen
dc.subjectCOMPUTER SOFTWAREen
dc.subjectCYLINDRICAL SAMPLESen
dc.subjectDAMAGE CRITERIAen
dc.subjectDEFORMATION AMPLITUDEen
dc.subjectDEFORMATION DEGREESen
dc.subjectTESTING SAMPLESen
dc.subjectTORSIONAL STRESSen
dc.titleDamage criterion comparison at unidirectional and alternating torsion of samplesen
dc.typeConference Paperen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecten
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.conference.name5th International Conference Recent Trends in Structural Materials, COMAT 2018en
dc.conference.date14 November 2018 through 16 November 2018-
dc.identifier.rsi38679820-
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1757-899X/461/1/012086-
dc.identifier.scopus85059436761-
local.affiliationUral Federal University, Mira street 19, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.affiliationRudny Industrial Institute, 50 years of October street 38, Rudny, Kazakhstanen
local.contributor.employeeБогатов Александр Александровичru
local.contributor.employeeТолкушкин Андрей Олеговичru
local.issue1-
local.volume461-
local.identifier.pure8545026-
local.description.order12086-
local.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85059436761-
Располагается в коллекциях:Научные публикации ученых УрФУ, проиндексированные в SCOPUS и WoS CC

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
2-s2.0-85059436761.pdf1,13 MBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.