Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/131533
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorMakarova, E. B.en
dc.contributor.authorKorch, M. A.en
dc.contributor.authorFadeyev, F. A.en
dc.contributor.authorBliznets, D. G.en
dc.contributor.authorBugayova, A. V.en
dc.contributor.authorShklyar, T. F.en
dc.contributor.authorSafronov, A. P.en
dc.contributor.authorNokhrin, K. A.en
dc.contributor.authorBlyakhman, F. A.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-08T11:07:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-08T11:07:53Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationМакарова, ЭБ, Корч, МА, Фадеев, Ф, Близнец, ДГ, Бугаёва, А, Шкляр, Т, Сафронов, А, Нохрин, К & Бляхман, Ф 2022, 'Тестирование гидрогеля p-HEMA в качестве имплантационного материала для замещения костно-хрящевых дефектов у животных', Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов, Том. 24, № 2, стр. 71-82. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2022-2-71-82harvard_pure
dc.identifier.citationМакарова, Э. Б., Корч, М. А., Фадеев, Ф., Близнец, Д. Г., Бугаёва, А., Шкляр, Т., Сафронов, А., Нохрин, К., & Бляхман, Ф. (2022). Тестирование гидрогеля p-HEMA в качестве имплантационного материала для замещения костно-хрящевых дефектов у животных. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов, 24(2), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2022-2-71-82apa_pure
dc.identifier.issn1995-1191-
dc.identifier.otherFinal2
dc.identifier.otherAll Open Access; Gold Open Access3
dc.identifier.otherhttps://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/download/1482/13121
dc.identifier.otherhttps://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/download/1482/1312pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/131533-
dc.description.abstractObjective: to evaluate the features of reparative chondrogenesis and osteogenesis in animal experiments with the implantation of porous poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) hydrogel into osteochondral defects. Materials and methods. Cylindrical pHEMA implants (5 mm in diameter) were synthesized by radical polymerization. The implants were subjected to light microscopy and mechanical tests to characterize the structure and viscoelastic properties of the material. In experimental group #1, four pHEMA specimens were implanted into formed defects in the distal femoral epiphysis of rabbits. In experimental group #2, allogeneic chondrocytes were applied to the surface of four specimens before implantation. In the control series, four defects were not replaced with implants. Tissue regeneration was investigated by morphological and morphometric methods 30 days after operation. Results. The pHEMA implants were heterogeneous specimens with irregularly shaped pores - up to 30 × 10 μm at the surface and 300 × 120 μm inside. With >10% static compressive stress, the Young's modulus was 54.7 kPa. For dynamic stress, increased frequency of compression-relaxation cycles from 0.01 Hz to 20.0 Hz led to increased storage modulus from 20 kPa to 38 kPa on average, and increased loss modulus from 2 kPa to 10 kPa. Indicators of semi-quantitative assessment of local inflammatory response to pHEMA implantation had the following values in points: pHEMA, 4.7 ± 0.3; pHEMA with allogeneic chondrocytes, 6.0 ± 1.0; control, 4.3 ± 0.3. The ratio of connective, bone, and cartilage tissues proper in the regenerates had the following respective values: pHEMA, 79%, 20%, 1%; pHEMA with chondrocytes, 82%, 16%, 2%; control, 9%, 74%, 17%. Conclusion. In a short-term experiment, pHEMA implants did not trigger a pronounced inflammatory response in the surrounding tissues and can be classified as biocompatible materials. However, the tested implants had low conductivity with respect to bone and cartilage cells, which can be improved by stabilizing the pore size and increasing the rigidity when synthesizing the material. © 2022 Authors. All rights reserved.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoruen
dc.publisherRussian Transplant Societyen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rightscc-byother
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/unpaywall
dc.sourceRussian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs2
dc.sourceVestnik Transplantologii i Iskusstvennykh Organoven
dc.subjectBIOCOMPATIBILITYen
dc.subjectBONE TISSUEen
dc.subjectCARTILAGE TISSUEen
dc.subjectIMPLANTSen
dc.subjectOSTEOCHONDRAL DEFECTSen
dc.subjectPHEMA HYDROGELen
dc.subjectPHYSICAL PROPERTIESen
dc.subjectHYDROGELen
dc.subjectPOLYMACONen
dc.subjectANIMAL CELLen
dc.subjectANIMAL EXPERIMENTen
dc.subjectANIMAL MODELen
dc.subjectANIMAL TISSUEen
dc.subjectARTICLEen
dc.subjectBONE DEFECTen
dc.subjectBONE DEVELOPMENTen
dc.subjectCARTILAGEen
dc.subjectCHONDROCYTEen
dc.subjectCHONDROGENESISen
dc.subjectCOMPRESSIONen
dc.subjectCONTROLLED STUDYen
dc.subjectFEMUR EPIPHYSISen
dc.subjectIMPLANTATIONen
dc.subjectINFLAMMATIONen
dc.subjectLEPORIDAEen
dc.subjectMATERIALS TESTINGen
dc.subjectMECHANICAL TESTen
dc.subjectMICROSCOPYen
dc.subjectMORPHOMETRYen
dc.subjectNONHUMANen
dc.subjectOSTEOCHONDRAL DEFECTen
dc.subjectPOLYMERIZATIONen
dc.subjectTISSUE REGENERATIONen
dc.subjectVISCOELASTICITYen
dc.subjectYOUNG MODULUSen
dc.titleTESTING OF THE PHEMA HYDROGEL AS AN IMPLANTATION MATERIAL FOR REPLACEMENT OF OSTEOCHONDRAL DEFECTS IN ANIMALSen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doi10.15825/1995-1191-2022-2-71-82-
dc.identifier.scopus85141286576-
local.contributor.employeeMakarova E.B., Ural State Medical University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, Chaklin Ural Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.employeeKorch M.A., Ural State Agrarian University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.employeeFadeyev F.A., Ural State Medical University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, Institute of Medical Cell Technology, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.employeeBliznets D.G., Chaklin Ural Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.employeeBugayova A.V., Ural State Medical University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.employeeShklyar T.F., Ural State Medical University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.employeeSafronov A.P., Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.employeeNokhrin K.A., Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.employeeBlyakhman F.A., Ural State Medical University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.description.firstpage71-
local.description.lastpage82-
local.issue2-
local.volume24-
dc.identifier.wos000868953100009-
local.contributor.departmentUral State Medical University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.departmentChaklin Ural Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.departmentUral State Agrarian University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.departmentInstitute of Medical Cell Technology, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.departmentUral Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federationen
local.identifier.pure31577849-
local.identifier.pure225e0f4a-6dcd-4077-bdb5-9481afcef5dauuid
local.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85141286576-
local.identifier.wosWOS:000868953100009-
Располагается в коллекциях:Научные публикации ученых УрФУ, проиндексированные в SCOPUS и WoS CC

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
2-s2.0-85141286576.pdf568,32 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Лицензия на ресурс: Лицензия Creative Commons Creative Commons