Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/130971
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorShipitsyna, Yu. S.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-05T16:36:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-05T16:36:35Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationШипицына, ЮС 2023, 'ОПРАВДАНИЕ ДЖОНА ЛОККА: «НАТУРАЛИЗАЦИЯ» БРИТАНСКОГО ИМПЕРИАЛИЗМА?', Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: История, № 3 (62), стр. 5-17. https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2023-3-5-17harvard_pure
dc.identifier.citationШипицына, Ю. С. (2023). ОПРАВДАНИЕ ДЖОНА ЛОККА: «НАТУРАЛИЗАЦИЯ» БРИТАНСКОГО ИМПЕРИАЛИЗМА? Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: История, (3 (62)), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2023-3-5-17apa_pure
dc.identifier.issn2219-3111-
dc.identifier.otherFinal2
dc.identifier.otherAll Open Access, Bronze3
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85176786613&doi=10.17072%2f2219-3111-2023-3-5-17&partnerID=40&md5=40e1f6712b6f9d56b7d23fc5422c1a511
dc.identifier.otherhttp://press.psu.ru/index.php/history/article/download/8181/5171pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/130971-
dc.description.abstractThe article is devoted to the problem of revaluing John Locke’s intellectual heritage. The denial of the “myth of the Given” in the tradition of empirical philosophy, the reconstruction of the political context of writing “The Two Treatises of Government”, as well as the criticism of post-colonial historians in the second half of the 20th century placed Locke’s authority in doubt. The paper analyzes the traditions of Locke’s “accusation” and “defense” that have developed in foreign and native historiography. The tradition of the accusation is based on some facts of the biog-raphy of Locke, including his concern with the writing of the Constitution of Carolina (16) and ownership of some territories of this colony, as well as his closeness to his patron Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury and the circumstances of Exclusion Crisis, in which he was participated. But even more resonant are some of Locke’s theories and arguments, as well as the logic of reasoning in his famous essays “Two treatises of government” and “An Essay concerning human understanding”. The tradition of defense appeal to the complex context of Locke’s life and writings. Locke’s discourse of justification has been researched from the point of view of the emotional reflection of professional historians, as well as a general crisis in historical consciousness, efforts to resolve which were realized in the term of “pastness of the past”. This approach defines new research. Moreover, the author pays attention to the actualization of Locke’s professional experience in the area of medicine in the works of historians. Com-prehensive knowledge of natural history, as well as long-term medical practice, not only influenced Locke’s ethics, but also determined his logic of argumentation. Locke’ favorite strategy for approving his ideas seems to be naturalization as giving a natural character to social terms and appeal for examples and proofs to natural phenomena. © 2023, Permskii Gosudarstvennyi Natsional'nyi Issledovatel'skii Universitet. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.sponsorshipRussian Science Foundation, RSF: 22-18-00488en
dc.description.sponsorship1 The reported study was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, the project № 22-18-00488 “The Crisis of Values and the Coping Strategies: the Idea of the "Common Wealth" in the Intellectual discourse of Britain and Russia (1650–1750)”.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoruen
dc.publisherPermskii Gosudarstvennyi Natsional'nyi Issledovatel'skii Universiteten
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RSF//22-18-00488en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.sourceВестник Пермского университета. История2
dc.sourcePerm University Herald - Historyen
dc.subjectDEONTOLOGYen
dc.subjectIMPERIALISMen
dc.subjectJOHN LOCKEen
dc.subjectNATURALIZATIONen
dc.subjectSCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONen
dc.subjectTHOMAS SYDENHAMen
dc.subject“PASTNESS OF THE PAST”en
dc.titleJUSTIFYING OF JOHN LOCKE: “NATURALIZATION” OF BRITISH IMLERIALISM?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.type|info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.identifier.rsi54631326-
dc.identifier.doi10.17072/2219-3111-2023-3-5-17-
dc.identifier.scopus85176786613-
local.contributor.employeeShipitsyna, Yu.S., Ural Federal University, Mira str., 19, Yekaterinburg, 620002, Russian Federationen
local.description.firstpage5-
local.description.lastpage17-
local.issue3-
local.volume62-
dc.identifier.wos001091683600001-
local.contributor.departmentUral Federal University, Mira str., 19, Yekaterinburg, 620002, Russian Federationen
local.identifier.pure47301482-
local.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85176786613-
local.fund.rsf22-18-00488-
local.identifier.wosWOS:001091683600001-
Располагается в коллекциях:Научные публикации ученых УрФУ, проиндексированные в SCOPUS и WoS CC

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
2-s2.0-85176786613.pdf622,56 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.