Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10995/112265
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKarapetyan, L. V.en
dc.contributor.authorGlotova, G. A.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-12T08:31:29Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-12T08:31:29Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationKarapetyan L. V. Internal Well-Being as a Complex Dynamic System / L. V. Karapetyan, G. A. Glotova // Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania. — 2021. — Vol. 51. — Iss. 3. — P. 404-416.en
dc.identifier.issn2307-2334-
dc.identifier.otherAll Open Access, Bronze3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10995/112265-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. The relevance of the study of the internal well-being of a person as a complex dynamic system is due to the need for empirical verification of post-non-classical ideas about complex psychological phenomena, which involves the comparison of various theoretical constructs and research tools related to the studied psychological phenomenon. Materials and methods. The sample was made up of cadets of the power university in the number of 169 people. Three methods of studying internal well-being based on different theoretical constructs were used: The author's method "Self-Assessment of emotional and personal well-being (SEPWB-24)", "Scale of psychological well-being" by K. Riff, the method "Subjective well-being" by R. M. Shamionov, T. V. Beskova. Results. On the basis of the Spearman correlation analysis, reliable (at p 0,001) relationships between all scales of the three methods used were confirmed. This can be seen as the presence of the general G-factor of "inner well-being". Differences in the strength of the relationships between the scales within the methods and between the scales of different methods are revealed, and different solutions are obtained in the factor analysis, which indicates the presence of S and U factors-determinants of internal well-being as a complex dynamic system. © 2021 LLC Ecological Help. All rights reserved.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoruen
dc.publisherLLC Ecological Helpen1
dc.publisherScientific and Educational Initiativeen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.sourcePerspekt. Nauki Obraz.2
dc.sourcePerspektivy Nauki i Obrazovaniaen
dc.subjectEMOTIONAL AND PERSONAL WELL-BEINGen
dc.subjectINTERNAL WELL-BEINGen
dc.subjectPSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEINGen
dc.subjectSUBJECTIVE WELL-BEINGen
dc.titleInternal Well-Being as a Complex Dynamic Systemen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.identifier.scopus85109340035-
local.contributor.employeeKarapetyan, L.V., Department of General and Social Psychology, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia Boris Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Glotova, G.A., Leading Researcher of Laboratory of Pedagogical Psychology of Psychological Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federationen
local.description.firstpage404-
local.description.lastpage416-
local.issue3-
local.volume51-
local.contributor.departmentDepartment of General and Social Psychology, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia Boris Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Leading Researcher of Laboratory of Pedagogical Psychology of Psychological Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federationen
local.identifier.pure22824809-
local.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85109340035-
Appears in Collections:Научные публикации, проиндексированные в SCOPUS и WoS CC

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2-s2.0-85109340035.pdf5,94 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.