Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10995/82660
Title: Technocratic and Humanistic Trends in Education: New Tunes
Authors: Bodnar, A.
Bodnar, E.
Makerova, V.
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Knowledge E
Citation: Bodnar A. Technocratic and Humanistic Trends in Education: New Tunes / A. Bodnar, E. Bodnar, V. Makerova // The Fifth International Luria Memorial Congress «Lurian Approach in International Psychological Science» (Ekaterinburg, Russia, 13–16 October, 2017). – Dubai : Knowledge E, 2018. – KnE Life Sciences, 4 (8). – pp. 172-181. – DOI 10.18502/kls.v4i8.3274
Abstract: Introduction. The fundamental difference between humanism and technocracy is the attitude toward a human: For a humanist, s/he is the goal, for a technocrat (of any professional affiliation), s/he is a means. For education, this became especially evident when it was labelled as a service sector. The technocratic projects of school and society in the twentieth century turned out to be unsustainable. Humanistic projects have always remained the examples of ‘abstract humanism’ in history. Humanistic concepts of education are based on the self-actualization of a person, technocratic ones (the second half of the twentieth century) are based on Skinner’s ideas that are still popular among practical people. The reason for their survivability is the simplicity and accessibility as well as the success of information technology that contributed to a new wave of technocracy. Humanistic concepts are not so obvious but they have no alternative. Materials and methods. Humanistically oriented teachers, theoretical modelling, surveys, the methods of Cattell, Rosenzweig, and Fidler, the descriptive statistics and discriminant analysis. Results. The situation is ambivalent. Humanists never shied away from advanced technologies and rational justification of their actions, while technocrats still do not always mask the anti-human nature of their position. Nevertheless, the problems of falsification and imitation of education noted by researchers as well as the charm of modern technologies are significant, and this veil hides (for many) the anti-humanity of technocracy. Our approach allows us to remain a humanist under the circumstances. Conclusion. Technology has always been and remains only a tool in the hands of people. The main thing is what kind of the world image exists in their minds, what they are ready to do to achieve their goals. Scientists offer a new humanistic project with the use of the twenty-first-century technologies. This work is a fragment of such a project. The authors would like to see the real action on turning education into a true priority area on the part of the country’s leadership.
Keywords: HUMANISM
TECHNOCRACY
MODERN EDUCATION
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10995/82660
metadata.dc.rights: Creative Commons Attribution License
License text: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Conference name: The Fifth International Luria Memorial Congress «Lurian Approach in International Psychological Science»
Conference date: 13.10.2017-16.10.2017
ISSN: 2413-0877
DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i8.3274
Origin: The Fifth International Luria Memorial Congress «Lurian Approach in International Psychological Science». — Ekaterinburg, 2018
Appears in Collections:Конференции, семинары

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
luria_2018_018.pdf342,05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons