Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/141679
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBorisov, G. I.en
dc.contributor.authorSergeeva, T. B.en
dc.contributor.authorGlukhanyuk, N. S.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-25T10:52:10Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-25T10:52:10Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationBorisov, G., Sergeeva, T., & Glukhanyuk, N. (2024). Предикторы субъективного благополучия и удовлетворенности жизнью людей позднего возраста: прикладной аспект. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 67(1), 590-610. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.1.33apa_pure
dc.identifier.issn2307-2334-
dc.identifier.otherFinal2
dc.identifier.otherAll Open Access; Gold Open Access3
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85187162653&doi=10.32744%2fpse.2024.1.33&partnerID=40&md5=cc345ffbbe89d275f256c44e1ef57edb1
dc.identifier.otherhttps://pnojournalarchive4.files.wordpress.com/2024/03/pdf_240133.pdfpdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/141679-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Maintaining and preserving well-being and life satisfaction in late age is an urgent task for society. Research and educational practice prove the positive relationship between learning, active aging and overall well-being. At the same time, the importance of optimizing educational programs based on reliable empirical data on personal characteristics that determine subjective well-being is emphasized. The study aims to identify general and specific predictors of a person’s subjective well-being in late age to determine the main principles of forming educational programs for older people. Materials and methods. The empirical study involved 528 respondents (387 female, 152 male) aged 45-75, the average age was 58 years. A complex of eleven psychodiagnostic methods, combined into three blocks, was implemented: methods for diagnosing subjective well-being, life satisfaction and their hypothetical predictors. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to process the data. Results. Regression models were obtained which describe predictors of types of subjective well-being in late age (model determination coefficients 0.238-0.636) and satisfaction with areas of life (model determination coefficients 0.336-0.619). The results allow specifying the influence mechanisms of such predictors as time perspective, hardiness, purpose in life orientations, optimism, readiness for age-related changes, coping strategies and self-regulation. Both general and specific predictors, as well as their empirical indicators, were established. Conclusion. Based on the identified predictors of subjective well-being and life satisfaction, the provisions and principles of designing educational programs for people of late age were formulated: creating a time perspective with positive goals, a conflict-free and supportive individual-oriented educational environment, promoting a person’s acceptance and adaptation to new social conditions, creating an adequate understanding of the learning situation, one’s goals and capabilities. © 2024 LLC Ecological Help. All rights reserved.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoruen
dc.publisherLLC Ecological Helpen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.sourcePerspectives of Science and Education2
dc.sourcePerspektivy Nauki i Obrazovaniaen
dc.subjectLATE AGEen
dc.subjectLIFE SATISFACTIONen
dc.subjectPREDICTORSen
dc.subjectPRINCIPLES OF FORMING EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMSen
dc.subjectSUBJECTIVE WELL-BEINGen
dc.titlePredictors of subjective well-being and life satisfaction of people in late age: applied aspect; [Предикторы субъективного благополучия и удовлетворенности жизнью людей позднего возраста: прикладной аспект]en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.identifier.rsi62769567-
dc.identifier.doi10.32744/pse.2024.1.33-
dc.identifier.scopus85187162653-
local.contributor.employeeBorisov G.I., the Department of General and Social Psychology Ural Federal University named after the First, Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.employeeSergeeva T.B., the Department of General and Social Psychology Ural Federal University named after the First, Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.employeeGlukhanyuk N.S., Department of Personnel Management and Psychology Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Russian Federationen
local.description.firstpage590-
local.description.lastpage610-
local.issue1-
local.volume67-
local.contributor.departmentthe Department of General and Social Psychology Ural Federal University named after the First, Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.departmentthe Department of General and Social Psychology Ural Federal University named after the First, Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Russian Federationen
local.contributor.departmentDepartment of Personnel Management and Psychology Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Russian Federationen
local.identifier.pure54326335-
local.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85187162653-
Appears in Collections:Научные публикации ученых УрФУ, проиндексированные в SCOPUS и WoS CC

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2-s2.0-85187162653.pdf7,79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.