Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/123008
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAli, H. M.en
dc.contributor.authorMahdi, L. A.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-29T12:19:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-29T12:19:04Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationAli H. M. Exergy Analysis of Chest Freezer Working with R-134a and R-600a at Steady State Conditions / Hayder M. Ali, Louay A. Mahdi // International Journal of Energy Production and Management. — 2023. — Vol. 8. Iss. 2. — P. 63-70.en
dc.identifier.issn2056-3272print
dc.identifier.issn2056-3280online
dc.identifier.urihttp://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/123008-
dc.descriptionReceived: 23 November 2022. Accepted: 28 April 2023.en
dc.description.abstractIn the present work, exergy analysis has been experimentally evaluated for a chest freezer to assist in sizing calculations and selecting the most suitable working fluid, which can reduce the power consumption. In the present work, exergy analysis has been experimentally evaluated for a chest freezer to assist in sizing calculations and selecting the most suitable working fluid to reduce power consumption. The experimental measurements were carried out using a 150 litters chest freezer volume capacity running on R-134a and R-600a using different compressors. The freezer provides measurement instruments for pressure, temperature, refrigerant mass flow and power consumption. The tests were carried out with a standard ambient temperature of 32. The results show that the evaporator had the highest exergy loss value of 59% for R-134a and 62% for R-600a. Compressor exergy losses are 64% for R-134a and 63% for R-600a. The condenser showed exercise losses of 79% for R-134a and 75% for R-600a, while the limitation device (capillary tube) had exercise losses of 87% for R134a and 99.5% for R-600a. The thermal performance of the chest freezer represented by the second low efficiency is 43% for R-134a and 50% for R-600a. The thermal performance of the freezer with R-600a is better than R-134a due to the energy consumption reducing and evaporator behaviour.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInternational Information and Engineering Technology Association (IIETA)en
dc.publisherUral Federal Universityen
dc.publisherУральский федеральный университетru
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Energy Production and Management. 2023. Vol. 8. Iss. 2en
dc.subjectEXERGY ANALYSISen
dc.subjectCHEST FREEZERen
dc.subjectSECOND LOW EFFICIENCYen
dc.subjectCOPen
dc.subjectREFRIGERANTSen
dc.titleExergy Analysis of Chest Freezer Working with R-134a and R-600a at Steady State Conditionsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.identifier.rsihttps://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54092615-
dc.identifier.doi10.18280/ijepm.080202-
local.description.firstpage63-
local.description.lastpage70-
local.issue2-
local.volume8-
local.contributorAli, Hayder M.en
local.contributorMahdi, Louay A.en
Appears in Collections:International Journal of Energy Production and Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ijepm_2023_v8_2_02.pdf1,39 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.