Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/130227
Название: Working Memory Capacity Depends on Attention Control, but Not Selective Attention
Авторы: Kotyusov, A. I.
Kasanov, D.
Kosachenko, A. I.
Gashkova, A. S.
Pavlov, Y. G.
Malykh, S.
Дата публикации: 2023
Издатель: MDPI
Библиографическое описание: Kotyusov, AI, Kasanov, D, Kosachenko, AI, Gashkova, AS, Pavlov, YG & Malykh, S 2023, 'Working Memory Capacity Depends on Attention Control, but Not Selective Attention', Behavioral Sciences, Том. 13, № 2, 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020092
Kotyusov, A. I., Kasanov, D., Kosachenko, A. I., Gashkova, A. S., Pavlov, Y. G., & Malykh, S. (2023). Working Memory Capacity Depends on Attention Control, but Not Selective Attention. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), [92]. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020092
Аннотация: Working memory and attention are interrelated constructs that are sometimes even considered indistinguishable. Since attention is not a uniform construct, it is possible that different types of attention affect working memory capacity differently. To clarify this issue, we investigated the relationship between working memory capacity and various components of attention. The sample consisted of 136 healthy adult participants aged 18 to 37 years (M = 20.58, SD = 2.74). Participants performed tasks typically used to assess working memory (operation span, change detection, simple digit span, and adaptive digit span tasks), selective attention (visual search task), and attention control (Stroop and antisaccade tasks). We tested several models with working memory and attention, either as a unitary factor or being divided into selective attention and attention control factors. A confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model with three latent variables—working memory capacity, attention control, and selective attention—fit the data best. Results showed that working memory and attention are distinct but correlated constructs: working memory capacity was only related to attention control, whereas attention control was related to both constructs. We propose that differences in working memory capacity are determined only by the ability to maintain attention on the task, while differences in the ability to filter out non-salient distractors are not related to working memory capacity. © 2023 by the authors.
Ключевые слова: ATTENTION CONTROL
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
SELECTIVE ATTENTION
WORKING MEMORY
URI: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/130227
Условия доступа: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
cc-by
Текст лицензии: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Идентификатор SCOPUS: 85148902029
Идентификатор WOS: 000938210500001
Идентификатор PURE: 35455439
ISSN: 2076-328X
DOI: 10.3390/bs13020092
Сведения о поддержке: Russian Science Foundation, RSF
This study was supported by a grant (No. 17-78-30028) from the Russian Science Foundation.
Карточка проекта РНФ: 17-78-30028
Располагается в коллекциях:Научные публикации ученых УрФУ, проиндексированные в SCOPUS и WoS CC

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
2-s2.0-85148902029.pdf651,31 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Лицензия на ресурс: Лицензия Creative Commons Creative Commons